Dr. Christophe Verbanck
View ProductCase 7:
This access was 1.0 x 1.50mm and the canal shapes were finally instrumented by a miniKUT 30/03. Despite this minimalistic treatment, three separate lateral canals were cleaned and filled in this vital case.
Case 6:
Simple, effective and clean. miniKUT 25/05 preparation making a thorough apical cleaning possible within the limits of MIE.
Case 5:
Severely decayed upper premolar with failing amalgam restoration shaped with miniKUT 25/05 to give room for 2 ‘small diameter’ fiber posts and restored for further indirect restoration.
Case 4:
Necrotic upper molar with a more challenging Mb1 and Mb2 anatomy. Since conventional irrigation (30G irrigation-needle) was used, shaping of the Mb’s was done to a .30 3% and the Db to a .35 3% all following rotary negotiation with the EZP .15 3% miniKUT file. The palatal canal was a straight and wide canal in comparison to the rest so a .45 3% nailed the job.
Case 3:
'The Bypass' Save and ‘stress-free’ bypass of a fractured instrument blocking the Ml root canal up to a .30 .03 in a lower first molar with 3 mesials and a previously enlarged distals. (Mb: .30 .03, mM: .20 03, Ml: .30 .03; Db-Dl: .35 .05).
Case 2:
‘The daily routine’ Upper first molar with a partial necrotic pulp and both small and wide canals. Mb1 and join to split again at the apex. A perfect blend of both .03 and .05 tapers were used to sufficiently prepare the canals and respect the lateral anatomy. (Mb1: .35 .03, Mb2: .15 03, Db: .25 .03, P: .30 .05).
Case 1:
‘MIE gone MIA’ The miniKUT .20 .03 (Mb2, Db) and .30 .03 (Mb1) and even the .35 .05 (palatal) allowed for working around dentin and enamel structures that maintain the structural integrity of the tooth. The flexibility of the .03 tapers made it possible to easily shape Mb1, Mb2 and all communicating canals.